|
WHAT WERE YOU
CHARGED WITH?
New Jersey Criminal Lawyer
Home
NJ Criminal Law:
Criminal Charge
Resource Ctr.
NJ Appellate Opinions
Criminal Law Articles
NJ Criminal Law Blog
Criminal Lawyer
Bio
FREE Consultation
15% discount to new web
clients using this form
Contact Info/Office
Directions
HARK & HARK
New Jersey Criminal Lawyer
1101 Marlton Pike West
Cherry Hill, NJ 08002
(866) 427-5529
Practicing in all NJ Counties
|
New Jersey Criminal Law Article By Jeffrey
Hark, Esq.
|
HARK & HARK
Hark & Hark
1101 ROUTE 70 WEST
CHERRY HILL, NJ 08002
856-354-0050
|
 |
Quereshi
v. Cintas Corporation
The issue here is
whether a judge of compensation must award counsel
fees in addition to a penalty when an employer fails
to make timely payment of temporary disability
benefits and the appropriate standard to fashion the
reasonable attorneys' fees allowed by statute.
The holding is the award of attorneys' fees is
mandatory and the judge of compensation is not
limited by the statutory formula governing fee
awards following an award of benefits.
The facts are as
follows. The employer failed to timely pay the
temporary benefits as required by a previous order.
The judge then assessed a penalty on the original
award but did not award additional attorney fees.
The Appellate Court found that the judge must award
reasonable attorneys' fees when a petitioner has to
incur legal fees to obtain the wrongfully or
negligently withheld funds.
With respect to the size of the award
of attorneys' fees, the court compared the statutory
language of § 64 and § 28.1. The court noted that in
§ 64 there was a specific limit on the size of the
award and in § 28.1 there was no corresponding
limit. The language of § 28.1 suggests that
reasonableness is bounded by the causal relation of
the need to incur an attorney's fee to obtain
previously award and expected benefits. The
legislative history also supports this
interpretation.
IF YOU WANT TO SCHEDULE AN
APPOINTMENT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO
MEET WITH YOU ANYTIME.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey Hark
Hark & Hark
|
|
|



 |