New Jersey Criminal lawyer Article

In this morning's Appellate Division decision in State v. Enright, the Court held that the Law Division is not bound by an improperly granted order under State v. Laurick, 120 N.J. 1 (1990). The order in question provided that the defendant's previous municipal court DWI conviction could not be used for sentence enhancement purposes. However, the Law Division declined to follow the order based upon the fact that underlying relief should never have been granted in municipal court as the defendant wqas legally ineligible for relief under Laurick. The Appellate Division's ruling affirms this decision by the Law Division.

HOWEVER, IT MUST BE NOTED THAT THIS DECISION FOUND THAT THE 'Laurick' orders must be based upon the lack of counsel. It is significant to note, however, that the Court went on to consider ineffective assistance of counsel as a the functional equivalent of lack of counsel for Laurick purposes.

IF YOU WANT TO SCHEDULE AN APPOINTMENT, I WOULD BE HAPPY TO MEET WITH YOU ANYTIME.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Hark
Hark & Hark

Contact experienced, aggressive
New Jersey criminal lawyer, Jeffrey Hark

new jersey dwi lawyer

internet sex crime lawyer

new jersey dui lawyer